Appellant was probationer. His work was under observation during probationary period, and he was given repeated opportunities to improve his performance for which his probation extended from time to time. The authority did not find him fit due to unsatisfactory work and brought the same to his notice.
The court analysed tests laid down in various decisions. And found that service of appellant was unsatisfactory and that he was given repeated opportunities to improve his performance.
(2006) 4 SCC 469, MANU/SC/1985/2006
Labour Law, Probation Period
None
None